The book Godless Fake Science demonstrates that much of the scientific narrative we have been taught from our school days onwards is based on falsehood and that the institution of ‘science’ itself has in many ways been hijacked by financial interests seeking to advance their own narrative and agenda. It has become clear to many that in the realm of modern institutionalised science that which is presented to the public as established fact is often nothing more than a consensus fabricated by powerful and ultra-wealthy groups of people. Modern society has been subjected to a network of lies and false narratives so pervasive it has become the accepted ‘norm’. However, the lies are certainly not accepted by all people. We have all been subjected to fake science and related ideologies that we were ‘born into’, and ‘educated’ to accept, and have thus been living in a ‘systematized delusion’.
.
.
.
.
This article examines:
- fake climate science
- the fake pandemic and fake science in the bio-pharmaceutical sector
- a scientific dissent from Darwinism and the growing ‘intelligent design’ movement
- the limitation of mechanistic science and the church of ‘godless scientism’
Truth is important for without it we are lost, adrift, and rudderless in a sea of lies. If left to condition you, such fake narratives are going to send you sailing in the wrong direction. All things rest upon truth, and only by truth can the world be sustained.
“Rather than love, than money, than fame, give me truth. I sat at a table where were rich food and wine in abundance, and obsequious attendance, but sincerity and truth were not; and I went away hungry from the inhospitable board. “ – Henry David Thoreau
Modern science, like economics, banking, and corporate-owned mass media, has become part of a paradigm borne by deceit, and corporate greed; and which paints God out of the picture. The above book also examines how modern educational institutions, especially in the field of science, are operating a ‘knowledge filter’, in which any information that does not fit with the dominant theories or ideologies, is not presented to the students. This is apparent today in the subject areas including:
dominant theories of modern psychiatry, etc.
This is not necessarily a conscious decision; it is often done unconsciously. Furthermore, modern science has bypassed the pre-cautionary principle.
The manipulation and fraudulent distortion of scientific and economic data has long been used by the ‘new world order crowd’ to promote false and deceptive agendas. These agendas include bogus science posing as fact, which is then utilised to promote an ulterior agenda. By fully controlling the source of money creation and distribution the money-masters have been able to fund any agenda they wish and, similarly, defund anything they wish.
“Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild (banker)
The money creation process was hijacked by this same line of corporate mechanics in the Federal Reserve coup of 1913, and has been under private control ever since. See also the book Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers. Thus, society has become subjected to fake science, and subversive and atheistic ideologies, funded by money-masters that serve an ulterior agenda.
Fake Climate Science
An example of a false scientific narrative is that CO2, or methane emissions from livestock, such as cows, causes climate change. This is detailed in the book CO2 Climate Hoax. In addition, note the video presentations by renowned scientists on the Irish Climate Science Forum website.
“In the long history of the earth there has been almost no correlation between climate and co2… the paleoclimate record shows unambiguously that Co2 is not a control knob… the narrative is absurd… it gives governments the power to control the energy sector… for about 33 years, many of us have been battling against the climate hysteria… Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement… As long as scientists are rewarded for doing so they are unlikely to oppose the exploitation of science.” – Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT
Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences at MIT summarises the battle against the climate hysteria as follows:
“The ‘educated’ class is most vulnerable to the absurd narrative… when we talk about science we are to talking to people who have no idea even of the vocabulary… the situation is compounded when it comes to climate where… most scientists are also ignorant, but where their support for the narrative comforts the non-scientists. I suspect… this elite (educated class) feels they need to show they too have met challenges even if the challenges are purely imaginary, this seems particularly true of young people… most ordinary people don’t have these problems. Our task is to show the relevant people the people who make decisions for us, the political people, the overall stupidity of this issue rather than punching away at the details…” – Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT
Victims of the climate catastrophe narrative believe that “on the ground, more and more people are dying from heat wave flooding, wildfires and communities are being wiped out by rising seas.” Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the original UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and former head of the Paleo Geo-physics and Geo-dynamics department in Stockholm, has exposed this narrative as false. Yet none of this information is provided to students in the universities of the world today, not to mention on television. He states:
“I was the chairman of the only international committee on sea levels changes and as such a person I was elected to be the expert reviewer on the (UN IPPC) sea levels chapter. It was written by 38 persons and not a single one was a sea level specialist… I was shocked by the low quality it was like a student paper… I went through it and showed them that it was wrong and wrong and wrong… The scientific truth is on the side of the sceptics… When you come to the idea of ‘97% of scientists agree’ – this is just a lobbying trick 97%. I have thousands of high ranked scientists all over the world who agree that NO, CO2 is not the driving mechanism and that everything is exaggerated. There is no way that sea levels can rise by two meters by the beginning of the next century… this is against physics… In the field of physics 80 to 90% of physicists know that the Co2 hypothesis is wrong… I suspect that behind-the-scenes promoters… have an ulterior motive… It’s a wonderful way of controlling taxation controlling people.” – Dr Nils-Axel Mörner, a former Committee Chairman at the UN IPPC.
Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama, has provided detailed analysis of climate data, and has also shattered the narrative that “on the ground, more and more people are dying”[1]. I summarise the main points from his analysis below:
“temperatures were higher in the 1930s than today… the number of major tornadoes between 1954 and 1986 averaged 56/year, but between 1987 and 2020 the average was only 34/year; between 1895 and 2015 on average there has been no change in the number of very wet days per month, and no change in the number of very dry days per month, and the 20 driest months were before 1988… the incidence of wildfires in North America between 1600 and 2000 has decreased substantially… Antarctic sea ice coverage has increased up to 2014, then dropped for 3 years, and has been increasing significantly again since 2017; there is much more sea ice today than there was 2,000 years ago, coverage has been dropping in recent years in the artic…
Sea levels rose 12.5 cm per decade for 8,000 years and then it levelled off, now it rising only 2.5 cm per decade… climate related deaths have plummeted; hundreds of thousands of people used to die from hurricanes now it’s just dozens.” – Professor John R. Christy, Director of Atmospheric and Earth Sciences, University of Alabama
It appears that various weather-related events attributed to “CO2-induced climate change” are nothing of the sort. I note the following articles:
- Carbon Is Not the Enemy. End Chemtrails!
- They’re burning from the inside out.” Robert Brame on the Unusual Properties of the Pacific Palisades Fires
The Fake Pandemic and Fake Science in the Biopharmaceutical Sector
The book Godless Fake Science provides evidence of the fake Covid-19 pandemic; and details research indicating that a so-called Covid-19 virus does not actually exist and that the entire discipline of virology took a wrong turn (to put it kindly) in 1950s. Countless millions of viruses exist in nature that have no detrimental effect to us. The research of Dr Stefan Lanka, amongst other scientists and doctors, indicates pathogenic viruses that cause disease simply do not exist. Virus pandemics are a mega-corporate scam. Toxins are a cause of disease in the body – is it not time that modern-day vaccine adjuvants containing substances, such as the toxin aluminium, came under closer scrutiny?
See also the books No Worries No Virus and Transcending the Covid-19 Deception.
Another area rife with fake science is the bio-pharma and vaccine industry. Big pharma has paid more than $35 billion in criminal penalties for falsifying science. For example, Glaxo, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Merck, these companies have paid $35 billion in criminal penalties for lying to doctors, for defrauding and falsifying science, and for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans, due detrimental aspects and side effects of their drugs and health products.
Furthermore, whistleblowers have asserted that the pharmaceutical industry routinely modifies trial results to secure official approval for a new drug. In such instances, the motivation is profit. In 2015, Dr Richard Horton, then editor-in-chief of the Lancet, the prestigious medical journal, made the following observation:
”A lot of what is published is incorrect… on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research… much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness… scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data…” – Dr Richard Horton
An area of note is in relation to cholesterol, and statin drugs, the so-called miracle drugs widely prescribed to lower blood cholesterol levels. Statins are perhaps the most profitable drug in the history of medicine. According to Dr. Malcolm Kendrick:
“… the protection provided by statins is so small as to be not worth bothering about for most men and all women. Statins have many more side effects than has been admitted and their advocates should be treated with scepticism due to their links with the drugs’ manufacturers.” – Dr. Malcolm Kendrick
A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism – The Growing ‘Intelligent Design’ Movement
The atheistic theory of neo-Darwinian evolution has been incessantly promoted since the 1850s. Yet, in 2008, over 700 scientists, all with doctorate degrees[2], made a joint declaration titled A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism, stating:
“We are sceptical of claims for the ability of natural selection and random mutation to account for the complexity of life. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged”
The above book and the book Darwin’s Evolution and the Big Bang are Fake Science provide evidence and testimony that Darwin’s theory has no evidential basis; and summarises the research of many scientists and biologists that have exposed fundamental flaws in the theory. Yet, the theory is being taught by government education systems worldwide to billions of children, and students, in schools and universities. The groups behind the historical promotion and dissemination of this fake scientific doctrine are steeped in atheistic ideology.
“scientists did accept the theory before it was rigorously tested…. Evolutionary science became the search for confirming evidence, and the explaining away of negative evidence” – Phillip Johnson, Berkely law professor, Author
“Evolution became in a sense a scientific religion. Almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to ‘bend’ their observations to fit with it. To my mind the theory does not stand up at all.” – Lipson HS, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution”, Physics Bulletin, vol.31 (May 1980), p.138.
The fossil record does not support Darwin’s theory of evolution, or the mainstream theoretical evolutionary timeline that we were taught in school. Billions of organisms have been fossilized providing a record of life over millions of years yet instead of demonstrating gradual transition from one species to another, the fossil record clearly indicates a pattern in which species suddenly emerge fully formed, then exist virtually unchanged until they disappear from the fossil layers upon extinction. Darwin himself wrote:
“the number of intermediate [transitional] species… must be truly enormous. Why then is not every geological formation full of such intermediate links? Geology does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; this perhaps is the most obvious and serious objection against the Theory [of Evolution].” – Charles Darwin,Origin of Species book, pg 354:
And while there may be rare instances of species that seem part ape, part human, there is no evidence the one came from the other. To overcome this problem, Darwin argued, with no proof whatsoever, that the fossil record is extremely inaccurate and littered with gaps. He argued that future generations of paleontologists would fill these gaps via their research. After 150 years has the diligent research of modern paleontologists fulfilled Darwin’s prediction? As the following scientific extracts demonstrate, the answer to the above question is a resounding “no”. Over the past 150 years hundreds of thousands of fossils of extinct species have been found, but the entire fossil record shows no example of a transition from one species to another species anywhere.
“One hundred and twenty years of paleontological research later, it has become abundantly clear that the fossil record will not confirm this part of Darwin’s predictions. Nor is the problem a miserably poor record. The fossil record simply shows that this prediction is wrong… everyone knew it but preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, faced with a recalcitrant record obstinately refusing to yield Darwin’s predicted pattern, simply looked the other way.” – Eldredge, N. and Tattersall, I., The Myths of Human Evolution, 1982, p.45-46.
“But fossil species remain unchanged throughout most of their history and the record fails to contain a single example of a significant transition.” – Woodroof, D.S., Science, vol.208, 1980, pg.716.
“the fossil material is now so complete that the lack of transitional species cannot be explained as due to scarcity of material. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled.” – Professor Nils Heribert-Nilsson, Lund University, Sweden, 1954
“… speciation [the forming of a new species] whether in the remote galapagos, in the laboratory cages of the drosophilosopers, or in the crowded sediments of the palaeontologists, still has never been traced.” – Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan, Evolutionary biologists
The book also details that the Cambrian explosion shows species emerged suddenly and fully formed; and that nature exhibits irreducible complexity and design that refutes Darwin’s theory.
The Limitation of Mechanistic Science and the Church of Godless Scientism
“… the fundamental and indispensable postulates of every genuinely productive science are not based on pure logic but rather on the metaphysical hypothesis – which no rules of logic can refute… It is only through the immediate dictate of our consciousness that we know that this world exists.” – Max Planck, Scientist
Modern science is mechanistic in its approach and is based on the premise that everything can be explained via observation and measurement of physical substances. The problem is that attempting to describe everything in a quantitative mathematical way has its limits. As soon as you try to explain in numbers, in mathematics, something like consciousness, conscience, instinct, inspiration, spiritual experiences, or life itself you run into problems.
Modern mechanistic science is therefore fairly limited as it is based on the effects of processes, but does not grasp their fundamental root causes. It assumes that we can describe the world independently of the existence of God. The direction of science over the past two centuries has been to see how far this approach can take us – to what extent can we explain nature, the world, the universe and everything whilst completely ignoring any reference to God, the soul and spiritual origins of everything.
Material science cannot validly explain consciousness, inspiration, love, or where these realities come from. The missing element in the mechanistic approach of modern-day science can be described as the spiritual element. So, modern science describes quantity very well, but it fails in the area of quality, cause, and meaning of life. Attempts to describe everything by mathematics and mechanistic science are becoming more and more ludicrous. Scientist, Marcus Schmieke, summed this up saying:
“the approach seems to be that most current theories require an invented, and as yet, neither proven nor unproven component, a new particle or a previously unheard-of constant, in order to appear conclusive.”
This is exemplified by gaping holes in the theory of modern physics and the search for the media-hyped inventions, such as the Higgs boson particle (its existence was never proved).
In 1931 Austrian mathematician Kurt Gödel actually proved that humankind will never be able to describe the universe by a final mechanistic theory – Gödel’s proof is outlined in the above book. At the last hurdle science always needs God. Werner Heisenberg, Nobel Laureate, once said “The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass God is waiting for you”. In modern times, this final gulp of reality is unthinkable for the atheistic scientists.
“For nearly 100 years, Western natural science has tried to keep their struggle for the absolute truth open, using all kinds of trickery; it simply appeared unthinkable for them to ever lose that fight. The tricks employed mostly consisted of inventing new elements, new particles and new rules, the exact definition of which one could safely postpone.” – Marcus Schmieke, Scientist and Inventor
“For believers God is in the beginning, and for physicists He is at the end of all considerations” – Max Planck, Physicist
The modern-day proponents of ‘godless science’ are simply regurgitating a rigid belief mostly based on faith, i.e., faith in godless scientism, the scientism they are indoctrinated into by television, government funded schools, corporate media, and media-induced popular opinion, without a shred of ‘real’ evidence. This denial of God can be traced back to a hijacking of science in the 1800s by the atheistic promoters of Darwin’s theory of evolution, a theory which implies that God does not exist. Prior to this pivotal agenda most scientists believed in the existence of the Creator. After the well-funded popularization of Darwin’s theory, spirituality was expelled from science and, thus, modern science became a shackled servant of materialistic minds, and profit-making agendas.
Darwin’s theory provided the intellectual justification for removing God as the Creator. Darwinian evolution was then promoted not because of its scientific basis, but because of its ideological implications. Since then, origins involving God have been rejected by the scientific orthodoxy. Hence, the result is that by teaching and promoting Darwin’s theory, scientific and academic institutions worldwide imply that God does not exist. If intelligent design of nature, human biology, and the universe was admitted by modern science, the obvious scientific question becomes “who was the intelligent designer?”.
Contrary to ‘godless scientism’ the perfection of science is to scientifically explain that God is the original source. The book Godless Fake Science also contains quotes from many renowned scientists that have realized the existence of God.
”Overwhelming strong proofs of intelligent and benevolent design lie around us. The atheistic idea is so nonsensical that I cannot put it into word” – Lord Kelvin, the scientific father of thermodynamics
A Paradigm Shift Is Now Needed, in Which Material Science Is Re-united with the Science of Spirituality
“the stream of knowledge is heading toward a non-mechanical reality; the Universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine.” – Richard Conn Henry, Professor of Physics, John Hopkins University
“I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as superstition… we have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains”- John Eccles, Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology
“James 1:5. If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him.”
The above verse from the Christian Bible is pointing toward a universal spiritual truth, and is also consistent with the knowledge descending (from God) process described in the ancient Vedic Vedanta. I note also that the gnostic teachings of Jesus Christ are experiencing something of a revival. The gnostic concept of ‘inner knowing via a connection with ‘the Christ within’ is similar to the Vedic concept of ‘param-atma’, the divine spark of God within each soul.
In the book Original Christianity – Beyond Institutional Dogma I explore subjects including the gnostic teachings of Jesus, and the years of the life of Jesus (age 12 to 30) that are missing from the modern-day Bible.
*
Click the share button below to email/forward this article. Follow us on Instagram and X and subscribe to our Telegram Channel. Feel free to repost Global Research articles with proper attribution.
Author: Reality Books
The following books are available on Reality Books and on Amazon.com:
- Transcending the Climate Change Deception Toward Real Sustainability
- CO2 Climate Hoax – How Bankers Hijacked the Real Environment Movement
- Godless Fake Science
- No Worries No Virus
- Demonic Economics and the Tricks of the Bankers
- Fake Moon Landings and the Lies of NASA
- Censored History of WW2 and Communism
- Original Christianity – Beyond Institutional Dogma
- Darwin’s Evolution and the Big Bang are Fake Science
Notes
[1] Source: Irish Climate Science Forum lecture titled Testing Climate Claims 2021 Update available at www.icsf.ie
[2] The list of scientists and their qualifications is available at www.dissentfromdarwin.com
Global Research is a reader-funded media. We do not accept any funding from corporations or governments. Help us stay afloat. Click the image below to make a one-time or recurring donation.
Counter Information publish all articles following the Creative Commons rule creative commons. If you don't want your article to appear in this blog email me and I will remove it asap.
No comments:
Post a Comment